NVIDIA GeForce GTX 680 Mac Edition vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM GeForce GTX 680 Mac Edition and 4GB VRAM GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 680 Mac Edition 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (192.3GB/s vs 192.0GB/s)
256 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER 's Advantages
Released 6 years and 7 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 63% (1725MHz vs 1058MHz)
More VRAM (4GB vs 2GB)
Lower TDP (100W vs 195W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 680 Mac Edition
3.25 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER
+35%
4.416 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Apr 2013
Release Date
Nov 2019
GeForce 600
Generation
GeForce 16
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1006 MHz
Base Clock
1530 MHz
1058 MHz
Boost Clock
1725 MHz
1502 MHz
Memory Clock
1500 MHz
Memory
2GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
256bit
Memory Bus
128bit
192.3GB/s
Bandwidth
192.0GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
-
SM Count
20
1536
Shading Units
1280
128
TMUs
80
32
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
512 KB
L2 Cache
1024 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
33.86 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
55.20 GPixel/s
135.4 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
138.0 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
8.832 TFLOPS
3.250 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
4.416 TFLOPS
135.4 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
138.0 GFLOPS
Board Design
195W
TDP
100W
450 W
Suggested PSU
300 W
2x DVI
1x HDMI 1.4a
1x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
1x DVI
1x HDMI 2.0
1x DisplayPort 1.4a
2x 6-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin
Graphics Processor
GK104
GPU Name
TU116
GK104-400-A2
GPU Variant
TU116-250-KA-A1
Kepler
Architecture
Turing
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
12 nm
3.54 billion
Transistors
6.6 billion
294 mm²
Die Size
284 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.1
Vulkan
1.3
3.0
CUDA
7.5
5.1
Shader Model
6.6
