NVIDIA GeForce GTX 680 Mac Edition vs NVIDIA H200 NVL
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM GeForce GTX 680 Mac Edition and 141GB VRAM H200 NVL to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 680 Mac Edition 's Advantages
Lower TDP (195W vs 600W)
NVIDIA H200 NVL 's Advantages
Released 11 years and 7 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 69% (1785MHz vs 1058MHz)
More VRAM (141GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (4.89TB/s vs 192.3GB/s)
15360 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 680 Mac Edition
3.25 TFLOPS
H200 NVL
+1756%
60.32 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Apr 2013
Release Date
Nov 2024
GeForce 600
Generation
Server Hopper
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 5.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1006 MHz
Base Clock
1365 MHz
1058 MHz
Boost Clock
1785 MHz
1502 MHz
Memory Clock
1593 MHz
Memory
2GB
Memory Size
141GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
HBM3e
256bit
Memory Bus
6144bit
192.3GB/s
Bandwidth
4.89TB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
-
SM Count
132
1536
Shading Units
16896
128
TMUs
528
32
ROPs
24
-
Tensor Cores
528
-
-
-
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
256 KB (per SM)
512 KB
L2 Cache
50 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
33.86 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
42.84 GPixel/s
135.4 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
942.5 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
241.3 TFLOPS
3.250 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
60.32 TFLOPS
135.4 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
30.16 TFLOPS
Board Design
195W
TDP
600W
450 W
Suggested PSU
1000 W
2x DVI
1x HDMI 1.4a
1x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
No outputs
2x 6-pin
Power Connectors
8-pin EPS
Graphics Processor
GK104
GPU Name
GH100
GK104-400-A2
GPU Variant
-
Kepler
Architecture
Hopper
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
5 nm
3.54 billion
Transistors
80 billion
294 mm²
Die Size
814 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (11_0)
DirectX
N/A
4.6
OpenGL
N/A
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.1
Vulkan
N/A
3.0
CUDA
9.0
5.1
Shader Model
N/A
