NVIDIA GeForce GTX 680 Mac Edition vs Moore Threads MTT S4000
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM GeForce GTX 680 Mac Edition and 48GB VRAM Moore Threads MTT S4000 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 680 Mac Edition 's Advantages
Boost Clock1058MHz
Lower TDP (195W vs 450W)
Moore Threads MTT S4000 's Advantages
More VRAM (48GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (768.0GB/s vs 192.3GB/s)
6656 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 680 Mac Edition
3.25 TFLOPS
Moore Threads MTT S4000
+656%
24.58 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Apr 2013
Release Date
Unknown
GeForce 600
Generation
MUSA-Chunxiao
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 5.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1006 MHz
Base Clock
1500 MHz
1058 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1502 MHz
Memory Clock
2000 MHz
Memory
2GB
Memory Size
48GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
256bit
Memory Bus
384bit
192.3GB/s
Bandwidth
768.0GB/s
Render Config
-
Compute Units
64
-
-
-
1536
Shading Units
8192
128
TMUs
512
32
ROPs
512
-
Tensor Cores
128
-
-
-
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
-
512 KB
L2 Cache
4 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
33.86 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
768.0 GPixel/s
135.4 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
768.0 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
49.15 TFLOPS
3.250 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
24.58 TFLOPS
135.4 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
384.0 GFLOPS
Board Design
195W
TDP
450W
450 W
Suggested PSU
850 W
2x DVI
1x HDMI 1.4a
1x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
4x DisplayPort 1.4a
2x 6-pin
Power Connectors
2x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
GK104
GPU Name
MTT Gen 2
GK104-400-A2
GPU Variant
-
Kepler
Architecture
MUSA-Chunxiao
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
12 nm
3.54 billion
Transistors
22 billion
294 mm²
Die Size
Unknown
Graphics Features
12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.1
Vulkan
1.4
3.0
CUDA
-
5.1
Shader Model
6.5
