NVIDIA GeForce GTX 680M vs NVIDIA NVS 5200M
We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM GeForce GTX 680M and 1024MB VRAM NVS 5200M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 680M 's Advantages
Boost Clock758MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (115.2GB/s vs 14.40GB/s)
1248 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA NVS 5200M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (25W vs 100W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 680M
+749%
2.038 TFLOPS
NVS 5200M
0.24 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Jun 2012
Release Date
Jun 2012
GeForce 600M
Generation
NVS Mobile
Mobile
Type
Mobile
MXM-B (3.0)
Bus Interface
MXM
Clock Speeds
719 MHz
Base Clock
-
758 MHz
Boost Clock
-
900 MHz
Memory Clock
900 MHz
Memory
4GB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
DDR3
256bit
Memory Bus
64bit
115.2GB/s
Bandwidth
14.40GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
-
SM Count
2
1344
Shading Units
96
112
TMUs
16
32
ROPs
4
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
512 KB
L2 Cache
128 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
21.22 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.500 GPixel/s
84.90 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
10.00 GTexel/s
-
-
-
2.038 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
240.0 GFLOPS
84.90 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
20.00 GFLOPS
Board Design
100W
TDP
25W
-
-
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
-
Graphics Processor
GK104
GPU Name
GF117
N13E-GTX-A2
GPU Variant
N13M-NS1
Kepler
Architecture
Fermi 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
28 nm
3.54 billion
Transistors
0.585 billion
294 mm²
Die Size
116 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.1
Vulkan
N/A
3.0
CUDA
2.1
5.1
Shader Model
5.1
