CPU
GPU
SoC
Categories
Rankings
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
English
English
Close menu
Home
CPU
GPU
SoC
Categories
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
Home
GPU Comparison
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 680M vs AMD Radeon Pro WX 3200 Mobile
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 680M vs AMD Radeon Pro WX 3200 Mobile
VS
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 680M
AMD Radeon Pro WX 3200 Mobile
We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM GeForce GTX 680M and 4GB VRAM Radeon Pro WX 3200 Mobile to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 680M 's Advantages
Boost Clock758MHz
Larger VRAM bandwidth (115.2GB/s vs 64.00GB/s)
704 additional rendering cores
AMD Radeon Pro WX 3200 Mobile 's Advantages
Released 7 years and 1 months late
Lower TDP (65W vs 100W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 680M
+47%
2.038 TFLOPS
Radeon Pro WX 3200 Mobile
1.385 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 680M
VS
Radeon Pro WX 3200 Mobile
Graphics Card
Jun 2012
Release Date
Jul 2019
GeForce 600M
Generation
Radeon Pro Mobile
Mobile
Type
Mobile
MXM-B (3.0)
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x8
Clock Speeds
719 MHz
Base Clock
-
758 MHz
Boost Clock
-
900 MHz
Memory Clock
1000 MHz
Memory
4GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
128bit
115.2GB/s
Bandwidth
64.00GB/s
Render Config
-
SM Count
-
-
Compute Units
10
1344
Shading Units
640
112
TMUs
32
32
ROPs
16
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
512 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB
Theoretical Performance
21.22 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
17.31 GPixel/s
84.90 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
34.62 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
1385 GFLOPS
2.038 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1385 GFLOPS
84.90 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
86.56 GFLOPS
Graphics Processor
GK104
GPU Name
Polaris 23
N13E-GTX-A2
GPU Variant
Polaris 23 XT GLM
Kepler
Architecture
GCN 4.0
TSMC
Foundry
GlobalFoundries
28 nm
Process Size
14 nm
3.54 billion
Transistors
2.2 billion
294 mm²
Die Size
103 mm²
Board Design
100W
TDP
65W
-
Suggested PSU
-
No outputs
Outputs
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Features
12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
2.1
1.1
Vulkan
1.2
3.0
CUDA
-
5.1
Shader Model
6.4
Related GPU Comparisons
1
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 680M vs AMD Radeon RX 6650M
2
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 680M vs AMD Radeon R5 A240
3
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 680M vs AMD Radeon HD 8730M
4
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 680M vs ATI Mobility Radeon HD 3470
5
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 680M vs AMD Radeon HD 8970M
6
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 680M vs AMD Radeon 660M
7
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 680M vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 SUPER Max Q
8
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 680M vs AMD Radeon R5 A330
9
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 680M vs AMD Radeon HD 7970M
10
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 680M vs AMD FirePro M3100
Related News
1
AMD Ryzen 9000 DDR5 Memory Frequency Soars: Reaches 8000MHz with All Four Slots Occupied
2
Snapdragon 8 Gen 4 to Feature Frame Interpolation for GPU: A Game-Changing Experience
3
Intel Adds 5 New Device IDs to Latest Linux Xe Kernel in Preparation for Battlemage
4
Ryzen AI 9 365 Benchmark Results Leaked: Significant Improvements in Multi-Core and IPC Performance Over Previous Generation
5
Concerns Raised by Unstable 13th/14th Gen Core CPUs: Motherboard Manufacturers Worry About Impact on Arrow Lake Release and Sales
6
Do You Really Know What a "Rendering Engine" Is? Read This Article to Understand All About It
7
New AMD Zen5 Ryzen 9000 Motherboards X870E/X870 to Adopt USB4! But You’ll Have to Wait Two More Months
8
Surpassing RTX 2050! Intel's Next-Gen Integrated Graphics Benchmark Closely Approaches AMD
9
New Benchmarks for AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 Revealed: Single-Core Parity with R9 7945HX3D, Multi-Core Still Lower
10
X3D Performance Beyond Words! AMD Ryzen 7 9700X May Unlock Power Consumption: From 65W to 120W
© 2024 - TopCPU.net
Contact Us
Privacy Policy