Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce GTX 680M vs AMD Radeon R5 A255

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 680M vs AMD Radeon R5 A255

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM GeForce GTX 680M and 1024MB VRAM Radeon R5 A255 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 680M 's Advantages
More VRAM (4GB vs 1GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (115.2GB/s vs 64.00GB/s)
960 additional rendering cores
AMD Radeon R5 A255 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 7 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 24% (940MHz vs 758MHz)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 680M +182%
2.038 TFLOPS
Radeon R5 A255
0.721 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jun 2012
Release Date
Jan 2014
GeForce 600M
Generation
All-In-One
Mobile
Type
Mobile
MXM-B (3.0)
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x8

Clock Speeds

719 MHz
Base Clock
925 MHz
758 MHz
Boost Clock
940 MHz
900 MHz
Memory Clock
1000 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
128bit
115.2GB/s
Bandwidth
64.00GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
-
-
Compute Units
6
1344
Shading Units
384
112
TMUs
24
32
ROPs
8
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
512 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB

Theoretical Performance

21.22 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
7.520 GPixel/s
84.90 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
22.56 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
2.038 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
721.9 GFLOPS
84.90 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Graphics Processor

GK104
GPU Name
Topaz
N13E-GTX-A2
GPU Variant
Topaz PRO (216-0858030)
Kepler
Architecture
GCN 3.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
28 nm
3.54 billion
Transistors
1.55 billion
294 mm²
Die Size
125 mm²

Board Design

100W
TDP
Unknown
-
Suggested PSU
-
No outputs
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
None
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
2.1
1.1
Vulkan
1.2.170
3.0
CUDA
-
5.1
Shader Model
6.5

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy