NVIDIA GeForce GTX 680M vs NVIDIA RTX A2000 Max-Q
We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM GeForce GTX 680M and 4GB VRAM RTX A2000 Max Q to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA RTX A2000 Max-Q 's Advantages
Released 8 years and 10 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 59% (1207MHz vs 758MHz)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (176.0GB/s vs 115.2GB/s)
1216 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (95W vs 100W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 680M
2.038 TFLOPS
RTX A2000 Max Q
+203%
6.18 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Jun 2012
Release Date
Apr 2021
GeForce 600M
Generation
Ampere-MW
Mobile
Type
Mobile
MXM-B (3.0)
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16
Clock Speeds
719 MHz
Base Clock
682 MHz
758 MHz
Boost Clock
1207 MHz
900 MHz
Memory Clock
1375 MHz
Memory
4GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
256bit
Memory Bus
128bit
115.2GB/s
Bandwidth
176.0GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
-
SM Count
20
1344
Shading Units
2560
112
TMUs
80
32
ROPs
48
-
Tensor Cores
80
-
RT Cores
20
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
512 KB
L2 Cache
2 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
21.22 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
57.94 GPixel/s
84.90 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
96.56 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
6.180 TFLOPS
2.038 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
6.180 TFLOPS
84.90 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
96.56 GFLOPS
Board Design
100W
TDP
95W
-
-
-
No outputs
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
GK104
GPU Name
GA107
N13E-GTX-A2
GPU Variant
-
Kepler
Architecture
Ampere
TSMC
Foundry
Samsung
28 nm
Process Size
8 nm
3.54 billion
Transistors
8.7 billion
294 mm²
Die Size
200 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.1
Vulkan
1.3
3.0
CUDA
8.6
5.1
Shader Model
6.8
