Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 GM206 vs ATI FirePro V4800

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 GM206 vs ATI FirePro V4800

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM GeForce GTX 750 GM206 and 1024MB VRAM FirePro V4800 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 GM206 's Advantages
Released 5 years and 7 months late
Boost Clock1239MHz
More VRAM (2GB vs 1GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (80.19GB/s vs 57.60GB/s)
112 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (60W vs 69W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 750 GM206 +104%
1.269 TFLOPS
FirePro V4800
0.62 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Nov 2015
Release Date
Apr 2010
GeForce 700
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1087 MHz
Base Clock
-
1239 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1253 MHz
Memory Clock
900 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
80.19GB/s
Bandwidth
57.60GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
-
-
Compute Units
5
512
Shading Units
400
32
TMUs
20
32
ROPs
8
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
48 KB (per SMM)
L1 Cache
8 KB (per CU)
1024 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB

Theoretical Performance

39.65 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
6.200 GPixel/s
39.65 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
15.50 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
1269 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
620.0 GFLOPS
39.65 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Graphics Processor

GM206
GPU Name
Redwood
-
GPU Variant
Redwood XT GL
Maxwell 2.0
Architecture
TeraScale 2
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
40 nm
2.94 billion
Transistors
0.627 billion
228 mm²
Die Size
104 mm²

Board Design

60W
TDP
69W
250 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
2x DVI 1x HDMI 2.0
Outputs
1x DVI 2x DisplayPort 1.1
-
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
11.2 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.4
3.0
OpenCL
1.2
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
5.2
CUDA
-
6.4
Shader Model
5.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy