CPU
GPU
SoC
Categories
Rankings
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
English
English
Close menu
Home
CPU
GPU
SoC
Categories
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
Home
GPU Comparison
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti OEM vs AMD FirePro W9000
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti OEM vs AMD FirePro W9000
VS
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti OEM
AMD FirePro W9000
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM GeForce GTX 750 Ti OEM and 6GB VRAM FirePro W9000 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti OEM 's Advantages
Boost Clock1098MHz
Lower TDP (150W vs 274W)
AMD FirePro W9000 's Advantages
More VRAM (6GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (264.0GB/s vs 192.3GB/s)
1088 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 750 Ti OEM
2.108 TFLOPS
FirePro W9000
+89%
3.994 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 750 Ti OEM
VS
FirePro W9000
Graphics Card
Unknown
Release Date
Jun 2012
GeForce 700
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1033 MHz
Base Clock
-
1098 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1502 MHz
Memory Clock
1375 MHz
Memory
2GB
Memory Size
6GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
384bit
192.3GB/s
Bandwidth
264.0GB/s
Render Config
-
SM Count
-
-
Compute Units
32
960
Shading Units
2048
80
TMUs
128
24
ROPs
32
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
512 KB
L2 Cache
768 KB
Theoretical Performance
21.96 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
31.20 GPixel/s
87.84 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
124.8 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
2.108 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
3.994 TFLOPS
87.84 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
998.4 GFLOPS
Graphics Processor
GK106
GPU Name
Tahiti
-
GPU Variant
Tahiti XT GL
Kepler
Architecture
GCN 1.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
28 nm
2.54 billion
Transistors
4.313 billion
221 mm²
Die Size
352 mm²
Board Design
150W
TDP
274W
450 W
Suggested PSU
600 W
No outputs
Outputs
6x mini-DisplayPort 1.2 1x SDI
-
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Graphics Features
12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
1.2
1.1
Vulkan
1.2
3.0
CUDA
-
5.1
Shader Model
5.1
Related GPU Comparisons
1
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti OEM
2
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti OEM
3
NVIDIA NVS 310 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti OEM
4
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti OEM vs AMD Radeon RX 570
5
NVIDIA GeForce GT 730 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti OEM
6
NVIDIA GeForce GT 1030 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti OEM
7
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti OEM vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050
8
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti OEM vs NVIDIA GeForce 9600 GSO
9
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti OEM vs ATI Radeon HD 4450
10
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti OEM vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950 Low Power
Related News
1
Snapdragon 8 Gen 4 to Feature Frame Interpolation for GPU: A Game-Changing Experience
2
Intel Adds 5 New Device IDs to Latest Linux Xe Kernel in Preparation for Battlemage
3
Ryzen AI 9 365 Benchmark Results Leaked: Significant Improvements in Multi-Core and IPC Performance Over Previous Generation
4
Concerns Raised by Unstable 13th/14th Gen Core CPUs: Motherboard Manufacturers Worry About Impact on Arrow Lake Release and Sales
5
Do You Really Know What a "Rendering Engine" Is? Read This Article to Understand All About It
6
New AMD Zen5 Ryzen 9000 Motherboards X870E/X870 to Adopt USB4! But You’ll Have to Wait Two More Months
7
Surpassing RTX 2050! Intel's Next-Gen Integrated Graphics Benchmark Closely Approaches AMD
8
New Benchmarks for AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 Revealed: Single-Core Parity with R9 7945HX3D, Multi-Core Still Lower
9
X3D Performance Beyond Words! AMD Ryzen 7 9700X May Unlock Power Consumption: From 65W to 120W
10
First Benchmark Leak of Intel Core Ultra 7 268V: Single-Core Performance Soars by 20%, Still Lags Behind AMD
© 2024 - TopCPU.net
Contact Us
Privacy Policy