Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti OEM vs AMD FirePro W9100

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti OEM vs AMD FirePro W9100

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM GeForce GTX 750 Ti OEM and 16GB VRAM FirePro W9100 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti OEM 's Advantages
Boost Clock1098MHz
Lower TDP (150W vs 275W)
AMD FirePro W9100 's Advantages
More VRAM (16GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (320.0GB/s vs 192.3GB/s)
1856 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 750 Ti OEM
2.108 TFLOPS
FirePro W9100 +148%
5.238 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Unknown
Release Date
Mar 2014
GeForce 700
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1033 MHz
Base Clock
-
1098 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1502 MHz
Memory Clock
1250 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
16GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
512bit
192.3GB/s
Bandwidth
320.0GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
44
-
-
-
960
Shading Units
2816
80
TMUs
176
24
ROPs
64
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
512 KB
L2 Cache
1024 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

21.96 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
59.52 GPixel/s
87.84 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
163.7 GTexel/s
-
-
-
2.108 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
5.238 TFLOPS
87.84 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
2.619 TFLOPS

Board Design

150W
TDP
275W
450 W
Suggested PSU
600 W
No outputs
Outputs
6x mini-DisplayPort 1.2 1x S-Video
-
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

GK106
GPU Name
Hawaii
-
GPU Variant
Hawaii GL44
Kepler
Architecture
GCN 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
28 nm
2.54 billion
Transistors
6.2 billion
221 mm²
Die Size
438 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
2.0
1.1
Vulkan
1.2
3.0
CUDA
-
5.1
Shader Model
6.3

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy