Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti vs ATI FireMV 2250

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti vs ATI FireMV 2250

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM GeForce GTX 750 Ti and 256MB VRAM FireMV 2250 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti 's Advantages
Released 7 years and 1 months late
Boost Clock1085MHz
Larger VRAM bandwidth (86.40GB/s vs 12.80GB/s)
640 additional rendering cores
ATI FireMV 2250 's Advantages
Lower TDP (32W vs 60W)

Score

VS

Graphics Card

Feb 2014
Release Date
Jan 2007
GeForce 700
Generation
FireMV Multi-View
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 1.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1020 MHz
Base Clock
-
1085 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1350 MHz
Memory Clock
400 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
256MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
DDR2
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
86.40GB/s
Bandwidth
12.80GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
-
-
Compute Units
-
640
Shading Units
-
40
TMUs
4
16
ROPs
4
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
64 KB (per SMM)
L1 Cache
-
2 MB
L2 Cache
-

Theoretical Performance

17.36 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.400 GPixel/s
43.40 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
2.400 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
1389 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
-
43.40 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Graphics Processor

GM107
GPU Name
RV516
GM107-400-A2
GPU Variant
-
Maxwell
Architecture
R500
TSMC
Foundry
UMC
28 nm
Process Size
80 nm
1.87 billion
Transistors
0.107 billion
148 mm²
Die Size
100 mm²

Board Design

60W
TDP
32W
250 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
2x DVI 1x mini-HDMI 2.0
Outputs
1x S-Video 1x DMS-59
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
9.0c (9_3)
4.6
OpenGL
2.1
3.0
OpenCL
N/A
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
5.0
CUDA
-
5.1
Shader Model
3.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy