NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti vs AMD FirePro S9100
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM GeForce GTX 750 Ti and 12GB VRAM FirePro S9100 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti 's Advantages
Boost Clock1085MHz
Lower TDP (60W vs 225W)
AMD FirePro S9100 's Advantages
Released 8 months late
More VRAM (12GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (320.0GB/s vs 86.40GB/s)
1920 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 750 Ti
1.389 TFLOPS
FirePro S9100
+203%
4.219 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Feb 2014
Release Date
Oct 2014
GeForce 700
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1020 MHz
Base Clock
-
1085 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1350 MHz
Memory Clock
1250 MHz
Memory
2GB
Memory Size
12GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
512bit
86.40GB/s
Bandwidth
320.0GB/s
Render Config
-
Compute Units
40
-
-
-
640
Shading Units
2560
40
TMUs
160
16
ROPs
64
-
-
-
-
-
-
64 KB (per SMM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
2 MB
L2 Cache
1024 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
17.36 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
52.74 GPixel/s
43.40 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
131.8 GTexel/s
-
-
-
1389 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
4.219 TFLOPS
43.40 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
2.109 TFLOPS
Board Design
60W
TDP
225W
250 W
Suggested PSU
550 W
2x DVI
1x mini-HDMI 2.0
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
GM107
GPU Name
Hawaii
GM107-400-A2
GPU Variant
Hawaii GL40
Maxwell
Architecture
GCN 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
28 nm
1.87 billion
Transistors
6.2 billion
148 mm²
Die Size
438 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
2.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.2
5.0
CUDA
-
5.1
Shader Model
6.3
