NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti vs NVIDIA H200 NVL
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM GeForce GTX 750 Ti and 141GB VRAM H200 NVL to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti 's Advantages
Lower TDP (60W vs 600W)
NVIDIA H200 NVL 's Advantages
Released 10 years and 9 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 65% (1785MHz vs 1085MHz)
More VRAM (141GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (4.89TB/s vs 86.40GB/s)
16256 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 750 Ti
1.389 TFLOPS
H200 NVL
+4242%
60.32 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Feb 2014
Release Date
Nov 2024
GeForce 700
Generation
Server Hopper
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 5.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1020 MHz
Base Clock
1365 MHz
1085 MHz
Boost Clock
1785 MHz
1350 MHz
Memory Clock
1593 MHz
Memory
2GB
Memory Size
141GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
HBM3e
128bit
Memory Bus
6144bit
86.40GB/s
Bandwidth
4.89TB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
-
SM Count
132
640
Shading Units
16896
40
TMUs
528
16
ROPs
24
-
Tensor Cores
528
-
-
-
64 KB (per SMM)
L1 Cache
256 KB (per SM)
2 MB
L2 Cache
50 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
17.36 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
42.84 GPixel/s
43.40 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
942.5 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
241.3 TFLOPS
1389 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
60.32 TFLOPS
43.40 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
30.16 TFLOPS
Board Design
60W
TDP
600W
250 W
Suggested PSU
1000 W
2x DVI
1x mini-HDMI 2.0
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
8-pin EPS
Graphics Processor
GM107
GPU Name
GH100
GM107-400-A2
GPU Variant
-
Maxwell
Architecture
Hopper
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
5 nm
1.87 billion
Transistors
80 billion
148 mm²
Die Size
814 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (11_0)
DirectX
N/A
4.6
OpenGL
N/A
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
5.0
CUDA
9.0
5.1
Shader Model
N/A
