Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 vs ATI FireGL V8650

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 vs ATI FireGL V8650

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM GeForce GTX 750 and 2GB VRAM FireGL V8650 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 's Advantages
Released 6 years and 6 months late
Boost Clock1085MHz
192 additional rendering cores
ATI FireGL V8650 's Advantages
More VRAM (2GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (111.1GB/s vs 80.19GB/s)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 750 +152%
1.111 TFLOPS
FireGL V8650
0.44 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Feb 2014
Release Date
Aug 2007
GeForce 700
Generation
FireGL
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 1.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1020 MHz
Base Clock
-
1085 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1253 MHz
Memory Clock
868 MHz

Memory

1024MB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR4
128bit
Memory Bus
512bit
80.19GB/s
Bandwidth
111.1GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
4
-
-
-
512
Shading Units
320
32
TMUs
16
16
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
64 KB (per SMM)
L1 Cache
-
2 MB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

17.36 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
11.01 GPixel/s
34.72 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
11.01 GTexel/s
-
-
-
1111 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
440.3 GFLOPS
34.72 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

55W
TDP
Unknown
250 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
2x DVI 1x mini-HDMI 2.0
Outputs
2x DVI 1x S-Video
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

GM107
GPU Name
R600
GM107-300-A2
GPU Variant
R600 V8650 (215RGIDKA13FG)
Maxwell
Architecture
TeraScale
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
80 nm
1.87 billion
Transistors
0.72 billion
148 mm²
Die Size
420 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
10.0 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3 (full) 4.0 (partial)
3.0
OpenCL
N/A
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
5.0
CUDA
-
5.1
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy