Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 vs AMD FirePro S10000 Passive

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 vs AMD FirePro S10000 Passive

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM GeForce GTX 750 and 3GB VRAM FirePro S10000 Passive to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 3 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 14% (1085MHz vs 950MHz)
Lower TDP (55W vs 375W)
AMD FirePro S10000 Passive 's Advantages
More VRAM (3GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (240.0GB/s vs 80.19GB/s)
1280 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 750
1.111 TFLOPS
FirePro S10000 Passive +206%
3.405 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Feb 2014
Release Date
Nov 2012
GeForce 700
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1020 MHz
Base Clock
825 MHz
1085 MHz
Boost Clock
950 MHz
1253 MHz
Memory Clock
1250 MHz

Memory

1024MB
Memory Size
3GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
384bit
80.19GB/s
Bandwidth
240.0GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
28
-
-
-
512
Shading Units
1792
32
TMUs
112
16
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
64 KB (per SMM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
2 MB
L2 Cache
768 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

17.36 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
30.40 GPixel/s
34.72 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
106.4 GTexel/s
-
-
-
1111 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
3.405 TFLOPS
34.72 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
851.2 GFLOPS

Board Design

55W
TDP
375W
250 W
Suggested PSU
750 W
2x DVI 1x mini-HDMI 2.0
Outputs
1x DVI 1x mini-DisplayPort 1.2
None
Power Connectors
2x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

GM107
GPU Name
Tahiti
GM107-300-A2
GPU Variant
Tahiti PRO GL
Maxwell
Architecture
GCN 1.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
28 nm
1.87 billion
Transistors
4.313 billion
148 mm²
Die Size
352 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
1.2
1.3
Vulkan
1.2
5.0
CUDA
-
5.1
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy