Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 vs AMD FireStream 9270

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 vs AMD FireStream 9270

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM GeForce GTX 750 and 2GB VRAM FireStream 9270 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 's Advantages
Released 5 years and 3 months late
Boost Clock1085MHz
Lower TDP (55W vs 160W)
AMD FireStream 9270 's Advantages
More VRAM (2GB vs 1GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (115.2GB/s vs 80.19GB/s)
288 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 750
1.111 TFLOPS
FireStream 9270 +8%
1.2 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Feb 2014
Release Date
Nov 2008
GeForce 700
Generation
FireStream
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1020 MHz
Base Clock
-
1085 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1253 MHz
Memory Clock
900 MHz

Memory

1024MB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
80.19GB/s
Bandwidth
115.2GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
-
-
Compute Units
10
512
Shading Units
800
32
TMUs
40
16
ROPs
16
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
64 KB (per SMM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
2 MB
L2 Cache
256 KB

Theoretical Performance

17.36 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
12.00 GPixel/s
34.72 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
30.00 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
1111 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1200 GFLOPS
34.72 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
240.0 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

GM107
GPU Name
RV770
GM107-300-A2
GPU Variant
RV770 XT
Maxwell
Architecture
TeraScale
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
55 nm
1.87 billion
Transistors
0.956 billion
148 mm²
Die Size
256 mm²

Board Design

55W
TDP
160W
250 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
2x DVI 1x mini-HDMI 2.0
Outputs
1x DVI
None
Power Connectors
2x 6-pin

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
10.1 (10_1)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
5.0
CUDA
-
5.1
Shader Model
4.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy