Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760 OEM vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 295

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760 OEM vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 295

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM GeForce GTX 760 OEM and 896MB VRAM GeForce GTX 295 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760 OEM 's Advantages
Released 7 years and 10 months late
Boost Clock1046MHz
More VRAM (2GB vs 896GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (211.2GB/s vs 111.9GB/s)
1104 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (170W vs 289W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 760 OEM +371%
2.812 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 295
0.596 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Nov 2016
Release Date
Jan 2009
GeForce 700
Generation
GeForce 200
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

993 MHz
Base Clock
-
1046 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1650 MHz
Memory Clock
999 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
896MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR3
256bit
Memory Bus
448bit
211.2GB/s
Bandwidth
111.9GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
-
SM Count
30
1344
Shading Units
240
112
TMUs
80
32
ROPs
28
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
-
512 KB
L2 Cache
224 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

29.29 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
16.13 GPixel/s
117.2 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
46.08 GTexel/s
-
-
-
2.812 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
596.2 GFLOPS
117.2 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
74.52 GFLOPS

Board Design

170W
TDP
289W
450 W
Suggested PSU
600 W
2x DVI 1x HDMI 1.4a 1x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
2x DVI 1x HDMI
2x 6-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

GK104
GPU Name
GT200B
-
GPU Variant
G200-401-B3
Kepler
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
55 nm
3.54 billion
Transistors
1.4 billion
294 mm²
Die Size
470 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.1
Vulkan
N/A
3.0
CUDA
1.3
5.1
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy