Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760 OEM vs AMD Radeon R9 290

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760 OEM vs AMD Radeon R9 290

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM GeForce GTX 760 OEM and 4GB VRAM Radeon R9 290 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760 OEM 's Advantages
Released 3 years late
Boost Clock1046MHz
Lower TDP (170W vs 275W)
AMD Radeon R9 290 's Advantages
More VRAM (4GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (320.0GB/s vs 211.2GB/s)
1216 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 760 OEM
2.812 TFLOPS
Radeon R9 290 +72%
4.849 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Nov 2016
Release Date
Nov 2013
GeForce 700
Generation
Volcanic Islands
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

993 MHz
Base Clock
-
1046 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1650 MHz
Memory Clock
1250 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
512bit
211.2GB/s
Bandwidth
320.0GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
40
-
-
-
1344
Shading Units
2560
112
TMUs
160
32
ROPs
64
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
512 KB
L2 Cache
1024 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

29.29 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
60.61 GPixel/s
117.2 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
151.5 GTexel/s
-
-
-
2.812 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
4.849 TFLOPS
117.2 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
606.1 GFLOPS

Board Design

170W
TDP
275W
450 W
Suggested PSU
600 W
2x DVI 1x HDMI 1.4a 1x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
2x DVI 1x HDMI 1.4a 1x DisplayPort 1.2
2x 6-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

GK104
GPU Name
Hawaii
-
GPU Variant
Hawaii PRO (215-0852020)
Kepler
Architecture
GCN 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
28 nm
3.54 billion
Transistors
6.2 billion
294 mm²
Die Size
438 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
2.0
1.1
Vulkan
1.2
3.0
CUDA
-
5.1
Shader Model
6.3

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy