Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM Rebrand vs ATI Radeon X1650 GT

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM Rebrand vs ATI Radeon X1650 GT

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM Rebrand and 128MB VRAM Radeon X1650 GT to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM Rebrand 's Advantages
Released 6 years and 3 months late
Boost Clock980MHz
Larger VRAM bandwidth (192.3GB/s vs 12.80GB/s)
1344 additional rendering cores

Score

VS

Graphics Card

Aug 2013
Release Date
May 2007
GeForce 700
Generation
Radeon R500 PCIe
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 1.0 x16

Clock Speeds

915 MHz
Base Clock
-
980 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1502 MHz
Memory Clock
400 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
128MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR3
256bit
Memory Bus
128bit
192.3GB/s
Bandwidth
12.80GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
-
-
Compute Units
-
1344
Shading Units
-
112
TMUs
8
32
ROPs
8
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
-
512 KB
L2 Cache
-

Theoretical Performance

27.44 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
3.200 GPixel/s
109.8 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
3.200 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
2.634 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
-
109.8 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Graphics Processor

GK104
GPU Name
RV560
GK104-325-A2
GPU Variant
RV560 GT
Kepler
Architecture
Ultra-Threaded SE
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
80 nm
3.54 billion
Transistors
0.312 billion
294 mm²
Die Size
230 mm²

Board Design

170W
TDP
Unknown
450 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
2x DVI 1x HDMI 1.4a 1x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
1x DVI 1x VGA 1x S-Video
2x 6-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
9.0c (9_3)
4.6
OpenGL
2.1
3.0
OpenCL
N/A
1.1
Vulkan
N/A
3.0
CUDA
-
5.1
Shader Model
3.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy