CPU
GPU
SoC
Categories
Rankings
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
English
English
Close menu
Home
CPU
GPU
SoC
Categories
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
Home
GPU Comparison
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM vs ATI Radeon HD 2400 PRO PCI
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM vs ATI Radeon HD 2400 PRO PCI
VS
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM
ATI Radeon HD 2400 PRO PCI
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM and 512MB VRAM ATI Radeon HD 2400 PRO PCI to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM 's Advantages
Released 6 years and 3 months late
Boost Clock980MHz
Larger VRAM bandwidth (192.3GB/s vs 6.400GB/s)
1304 additional rendering cores
ATI Radeon HD 2400 PRO PCI 's Advantages
Lower TDP (20W vs 170W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM
+6171%
2.634 TFLOPS
ATI Radeon HD 2400 PRO PCI
0.042 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM
VS
ATI Radeon HD 2400 PRO PCI
Graphics Card
Sep 2013
Release Date
Jun 2007
GeForce 700
Generation
Radeon R600
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCI
Clock Speeds
915 MHz
Base Clock
-
980 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1502 MHz
Memory Clock
400 MHz
Memory
2GB
Memory Size
512MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
DDR2
256bit
Memory Bus
64bit
192.3GB/s
Bandwidth
6.400GB/s
Render Config
-
SM Count
-
-
Compute Units
2
1344
Shading Units
40
112
TMUs
4
32
ROPs
4
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
-
512 KB
L2 Cache
32 KB
Theoretical Performance
27.44 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.100 GPixel/s
109.8 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
2.100 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
2.634 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
42.00 GFLOPS
109.8 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Graphics Processor
GK104
GPU Name
RV610
-
GPU Variant
RV610 LE (215LKCAKA14FG)
Kepler
Architecture
TeraScale
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
65 nm
3.54 billion
Transistors
0.18 billion
294 mm²
Die Size
85 mm²
Board Design
170W
TDP
20W
450 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
2x DVI 1x HDMI 1.4a 1x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
1x DVI
2x 6-pin
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Features
12 (11_0)
DirectX
10.0 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
N/A
1.1
Vulkan
N/A
3.0
CUDA
-
5.1
Shader Model
4.0
Related GPU Comparisons
1
AMD Radeon R7 350 OEM vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM
2
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM vs NVIDIA GeForce 910M
3
AMD Radeon RX 6950 XT vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM
4
AMD Radeon RX 470D vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM
5
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM vs ATI Radeon X1050 AGP
6
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 6 GB Rev. 2 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM
7
ATI Radeon HD 4650 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM
8
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM vs ATI Radeon HD 4670 X2
9
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM vs AMD Radeon RX 470D
10
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM vs AMD Radeon Sky 500
Related News
1
Snapdragon 8 Gen 4 to Feature Frame Interpolation for GPU: A Game-Changing Experience
2
Intel Adds 5 New Device IDs to Latest Linux Xe Kernel in Preparation for Battlemage
3
Ryzen AI 9 365 Benchmark Results Leaked: Significant Improvements in Multi-Core and IPC Performance Over Previous Generation
4
Concerns Raised by Unstable 13th/14th Gen Core CPUs: Motherboard Manufacturers Worry About Impact on Arrow Lake Release and Sales
5
Do You Really Know What a "Rendering Engine" Is? Read This Article to Understand All About It
6
New AMD Zen5 Ryzen 9000 Motherboards X870E/X870 to Adopt USB4! But You’ll Have to Wait Two More Months
7
Surpassing RTX 2050! Intel's Next-Gen Integrated Graphics Benchmark Closely Approaches AMD
8
New Benchmarks for AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 Revealed: Single-Core Parity with R9 7945HX3D, Multi-Core Still Lower
9
X3D Performance Beyond Words! AMD Ryzen 7 9700X May Unlock Power Consumption: From 65W to 120W
10
First Benchmark Leak of Intel Core Ultra 7 268V: Single-Core Performance Soars by 20%, Still Lags Behind AMD
© 2024 - TopCPU.net
Contact Us
Privacy Policy