Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM vs AMD FirePro S9050

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM vs AMD FirePro S9050

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM and 12GB VRAM FirePro S9050 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM 's Advantages
Boost Clock980MHz
Lower TDP (170W vs 225W)
AMD FirePro S9050 's Advantages
Released 11 months late
More VRAM (12GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (264.0GB/s vs 192.3GB/s)
448 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM
2.634 TFLOPS
FirePro S9050 +22%
3.226 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Sep 2013
Release Date
Aug 2014
GeForce 700
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

915 MHz
Base Clock
-
980 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1502 MHz
Memory Clock
1375 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
12GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
384bit
192.3GB/s
Bandwidth
264.0GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
28
-
-
-
1344
Shading Units
1792
112
TMUs
112
32
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
512 KB
L2 Cache
768 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

27.44 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
28.80 GPixel/s
109.8 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
100.8 GTexel/s
-
-
-
2.634 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
3.226 TFLOPS
109.8 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
806.4 GFLOPS

Board Design

170W
TDP
225W
450 W
Suggested PSU
550 W
2x DVI 1x HDMI 1.4a 1x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
1x DisplayPort 1.2
2x 6-pin
Power Connectors
1x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

GK104
GPU Name
Tahiti
-
GPU Variant
Tahiti PRO GL
Kepler
Architecture
GCN 1.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
28 nm
3.54 billion
Transistors
4.313 billion
294 mm²
Die Size
352 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
1.2
1.1
Vulkan
1.2
3.0
CUDA
-
5.1
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy