Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760 vs ATI FireMV 2250

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760 vs ATI FireMV 2250

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM GeForce GTX 760 and 256MB VRAM FireMV 2250 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760 's Advantages
Released 6 years and 5 months late
Boost Clock1032MHz
Larger VRAM bandwidth (192.3GB/s vs 12.80GB/s)
1152 additional rendering cores
ATI FireMV 2250 's Advantages
Lower TDP (32W vs 170W)

Score

VS

Graphics Card

Jun 2013
Release Date
Jan 2007
GeForce 700
Generation
FireMV Multi-View
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 1.0 x16

Clock Speeds

980 MHz
Base Clock
-
1032 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1502 MHz
Memory Clock
400 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
256MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
DDR2
256bit
Memory Bus
128bit
192.3GB/s
Bandwidth
12.80GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
-
-
Compute Units
-
1152
Shading Units
-
96
TMUs
4
32
ROPs
4
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
-
512 KB
L2 Cache
-

Theoretical Performance

24.77 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.400 GPixel/s
99.07 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
2.400 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
2.378 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
-
99.07 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Graphics Processor

GK104
GPU Name
RV516
GK104-225-A2
GPU Variant
-
Kepler
Architecture
R500
TSMC
Foundry
UMC
28 nm
Process Size
80 nm
3.54 billion
Transistors
0.107 billion
294 mm²
Die Size
100 mm²

Board Design

170W
TDP
32W
450 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
2x DVI 1x HDMI 1.4a 1x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
1x S-Video 1x DMS-59
2x 6-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
9.0c (9_3)
4.6
OpenGL
2.1
3.0
OpenCL
N/A
1.1
Vulkan
N/A
3.0
CUDA
-
5.1
Shader Model
3.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy