CPU
GPU
SoC
Categories
Rankings
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
English
English
Close menu
Home
CPU
GPU
SoC
Categories
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
Home
GPU Comparison
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 Rev. 2
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 Rev. 2
VS
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 Rev. 2
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM GeForce GTX 760 and 896MB VRAM GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 Rev. 2 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760 's Advantages
Released 4 years and 7 months late
Boost Clock1032MHz
Larger VRAM bandwidth (192.3GB/s vs 111.9GB/s)
936 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (170W vs 171W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 760
+343%
2.378 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 Rev. 2
0.536 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 760
VS
GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 Rev. 2
Graphics Card
Jun 2013
Release Date
Nov 2008
GeForce 700
Generation
GeForce 200
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
980 MHz
Base Clock
-
1032 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1502 MHz
Memory Clock
999 MHz
Memory
2GB
Memory Size
896MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR3
256bit
Memory Bus
448bit
192.3GB/s
Bandwidth
111.9GB/s
Render Config
-
SM Count
27
-
Compute Units
-
1152
Shading Units
216
96
TMUs
72
32
ROPs
28
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
-
512 KB
L2 Cache
224 KB
Theoretical Performance
24.77 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
16.13 GPixel/s
99.07 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
41.47 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
2.378 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
536.5 GFLOPS
99.07 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
67.07 GFLOPS
Graphics Processor
GK104
GPU Name
GT200B
GK104-225-A2
GPU Variant
G200-103-B2
Kepler
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
55 nm
3.54 billion
Transistors
1.4 billion
294 mm²
Die Size
470 mm²
Board Design
170W
TDP
171W
450 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
2x DVI 1x HDMI 1.4a 1x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
2x DVI 1x S-Video
2x 6-pin
Power Connectors
2x 6-pin
Graphics Features
12 (11_0)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.1
Vulkan
N/A
3.0
CUDA
1.3
5.1
Shader Model
4.0
Related GPU Comparisons
1
ATI Radeon HD 4350 PCI vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760
2
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760 vs NVIDIA GeForce 9600 GTX
3
ATI FireGL V7700 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760
4
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti
5
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760 vs NVIDIA GeForce 840M
6
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760 vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 1030
7
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti
8
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760 vs AMD Radeon R9 290
9
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760 vs ATI FirePro 2450 Multi View
10
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760 vs ATI Radeon HD 5770 X2
Related News
1
Concerns Raised by Unstable 13th/14th Gen Core CPUs: Motherboard Manufacturers Worry About Impact on Arrow Lake Release and Sales
2
Do You Really Know What a "Rendering Engine" Is? Read This Article to Understand All About It
3
New AMD Zen5 Ryzen 9000 Motherboards X870E/X870 to Adopt USB4! But You’ll Have to Wait Two More Months
4
Surpassing RTX 2050! Intel's Next-Gen Integrated Graphics Benchmark Closely Approaches AMD
5
New Benchmarks for AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 Revealed: Single-Core Parity with R9 7945HX3D, Multi-Core Still Lower
6
X3D Performance Beyond Words! AMD Ryzen 7 9700X May Unlock Power Consumption: From 65W to 120W
7
First Benchmark Leak of Intel Core Ultra 7 268V: Single-Core Performance Soars by 20%, Still Lags Behind AMD
8
NVIDIA Grace CPU Benchmark Results Released, Stunning Performance
9
Minisforum Launches UM890 Pro Mini PC with R9 8945HS and Dual USB4 Ports
10
Does the Apple A18 Neural Engine Boast Superior Performance? Computational Power May Surpass M4 Chip
© 2024 - TopCPU.net
Contact Us
Privacy Policy