Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760 vs ATI Radeon X1650 AGP

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760 vs ATI Radeon X1650 AGP

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM GeForce GTX 760 and 256MB VRAM Radeon X1650 AGP to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760 's Advantages
Released 6 years and 4 months late
Boost Clock1032MHz
Larger VRAM bandwidth (192.3GB/s vs 12.80GB/s)
1152 additional rendering cores

Score

VS

Graphics Card

Jun 2013
Release Date
Feb 2007
GeForce 700
Generation
Radeon R500 AGP
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
AGP 8x

Clock Speeds

980 MHz
Base Clock
-
1032 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1502 MHz
Memory Clock
400 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
256MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
DDR2
256bit
Memory Bus
128bit
192.3GB/s
Bandwidth
12.80GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
-
-
Compute Units
-
1152
Shading Units
-
96
TMUs
4
32
ROPs
4
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
-
512 KB
L2 Cache
-

Theoretical Performance

24.77 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.000 GPixel/s
99.07 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
2.000 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
2.378 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
-
99.07 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Graphics Processor

GK104
GPU Name
RV530
GK104-225-A2
GPU Variant
RV530 X1650 (215CCCBKB12FG)
Kepler
Architecture
Ultra-Threaded SE
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
90 nm
3.54 billion
Transistors
0.157 billion
294 mm²
Die Size
150 mm²

Board Design

170W
TDP
Unknown
450 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
2x DVI 1x HDMI 1.4a 1x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
1x DVI 1x VGA 1x S-Video
2x 6-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
9.0c (9_3)
4.6
OpenGL
2.1
3.0
OpenCL
N/A
1.1
Vulkan
N/A
3.0
CUDA
-
5.1
Shader Model
3.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy