Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760 X2 vs ATI FireGL V8650

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760 X2 vs ATI FireGL V8650

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM GeForce GTX 760 X2 and 2GB VRAM FireGL V8650 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760 X2 's Advantages
Released 6 years and 3 months late
Boost Clock1072MHz
Larger VRAM bandwidth (192.3GB/s vs 111.1GB/s)
832 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 760 X2 +461%
2.47 TFLOPS
FireGL V8650
0.44 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Nov 2013
Release Date
Aug 2007
GeForce 700
Generation
FireGL
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 1.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1006 MHz
Base Clock
-
1072 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1502 MHz
Memory Clock
868 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR4
256bit
Memory Bus
512bit
192.3GB/s
Bandwidth
111.1GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
4
-
-
-
1152
Shading Units
320
96
TMUs
16
32
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
-
512 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

25.73 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
11.01 GPixel/s
102.9 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
11.01 GTexel/s
-
-
-
2.470 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
440.3 GFLOPS
102.9 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

250W
TDP
Unknown
600 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
3x DVI 1x mini-DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
2x DVI 1x S-Video
2x 8-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

GK104
GPU Name
R600
GK104-225-A2
GPU Variant
R600 V8650 (215RGIDKA13FG)
Kepler
Architecture
TeraScale
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
80 nm
3.54 billion
Transistors
0.72 billion
294 mm²
Die Size
420 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
10.0 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3 (full) 4.0 (partial)
3.0
OpenCL
N/A
1.1
Vulkan
N/A
3.0
CUDA
-
5.1
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy