Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760 X2 vs ATI FirePro V7900 SDI

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760 X2 vs ATI FirePro V7900 SDI

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM GeForce GTX 760 X2 and 2GB VRAM FirePro V7900 SDI to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760 X2 's Advantages
Released 2 years and 6 months late
Boost Clock1072MHz
Larger VRAM bandwidth (192.3GB/s vs 160.0GB/s)
ATI FirePro V7900 SDI 's Advantages
128 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (150W vs 250W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 760 X2 +33%
2.47 TFLOPS
FirePro V7900 SDI
1.856 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Nov 2013
Release Date
May 2011
GeForce 700
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1006 MHz
Base Clock
-
1072 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1502 MHz
Memory Clock
1250 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
256bit
192.3GB/s
Bandwidth
160.0GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
20
-
-
-
1152
Shading Units
1280
96
TMUs
80
32
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
8 KB (per CU)
512 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

25.73 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
23.20 GPixel/s
102.9 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
58.00 GTexel/s
-
-
-
2.470 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1.856 TFLOPS
102.9 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
464.0 GFLOPS

Board Design

250W
TDP
150W
600 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
3x DVI 1x mini-DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
4x SDI
2x 8-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

GK104
GPU Name
Cayman
GK104-225-A2
GPU Variant
Cayman PRO GL
Kepler
Architecture
TeraScale 3
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
40 nm
3.54 billion
Transistors
2.64 billion
294 mm²
Die Size
389 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
11.2 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.4
3.0
OpenCL
1.2
1.1
Vulkan
N/A
3.0
CUDA
-
5.1
Shader Model
5.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy