Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760 X2 vs ATI Radeon HD 4250

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760 X2 vs ATI Radeon HD 4250

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM GeForce GTX 760 X2 and 512MB VRAM Radeon HD 4250 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760 X2 's Advantages
Released 4 years and 9 months late
Boost Clock1072MHz
More VRAM (2GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (192.3GB/s vs 6.336GB/s)
1112 additional rendering cores
ATI Radeon HD 4250 's Advantages
Lower TDP (25W vs 250W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 760 X2 +5045%
2.47 TFLOPS
Radeon HD 4250
0.048 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Nov 2013
Release Date
Feb 2009
GeForce 700
Generation
Radeon R600
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1006 MHz
Base Clock
-
1072 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1502 MHz
Memory Clock
396 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
512MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
DDR2
256bit
Memory Bus
64bit
192.3GB/s
Bandwidth
6.336GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
2
-
-
-
1152
Shading Units
40
96
TMUs
4
32
ROPs
4
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
-
512 KB
L2 Cache
64 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

25.73 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.376 GPixel/s
102.9 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
2.376 GTexel/s
-
-
-
2.470 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
47.52 GFLOPS
102.9 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

250W
TDP
25W
600 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
3x DVI 1x mini-DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
1x DVI 1x VGA 1x S-Video
2x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

GK104
GPU Name
RV620
GK104-225-A2
GPU Variant
RV620 LE
Kepler
Architecture
TeraScale
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
55 nm
3.54 billion
Transistors
0.181 billion
294 mm²
Die Size
67 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
10.1 (10_1)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
N/A
1.1
Vulkan
N/A
3.0
CUDA
-
5.1
Shader Model
4.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy