Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760M vs AMD FirePro M3900

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760M vs AMD FirePro M3900

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM GeForce GTX 760M and 1024MB VRAM FirePro M3900 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760M 's Advantages
Released 2 years and 7 months late
Boost Clock657MHz
More VRAM (2GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (64.13GB/s vs 14.40GB/s)
608 additional rendering cores
AMD FirePro M3900 's Advantages
Lower TDP (20W vs 55W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 760M +320%
1.009 TFLOPS
FirePro M3900
0.24 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

May 2013
Release Date
Oct 2010
GeForce 700M
Generation
FirePro Mobile
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

628 MHz
Base Clock
-
657 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1002 MHz
Memory Clock
900 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
64bit
64.13GB/s
Bandwidth
14.40GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
2
-
-
-
768
Shading Units
160
64
TMUs
8
16
ROPs
4
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
8 KB (per CU)
256 KB
L2 Cache
128 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

10.51 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
3.000 GPixel/s
42.05 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
6.000 GTexel/s
-
-
-
1009 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
240.0 GFLOPS
42.05 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

55W
TDP
20W
-
-
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
-
-
-

Graphics Processor

GK106
GPU Name
Seymour
N14E-GL-A1
GPU Variant
Seymour GL
Kepler
Architecture
TeraScale 2
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
40 nm
2.54 billion
Transistors
0.37 billion
221 mm²
Die Size
67 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
11.2 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.4
3.0
OpenCL
1.2
1.1
Vulkan
N/A
3.0
CUDA
-
5.1
Shader Model
5.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy