Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce GTX 765M vs NVIDIA GeForce MX350

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 765M vs NVIDIA GeForce MX350

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM GeForce GTX 765M and 2GB VRAM GeForce MX350 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 765M 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (64.13GB/s vs 56.06GB/s)
128 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA GeForce MX350 's Advantages
Released 6 years and 9 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 9% (937MHz vs 863MHz)
Lower TDP (20W vs 75W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 765M +10%
1.326 TFLOPS
GeForce MX350
1.199 TFLOPS
Blender
GeForce GTX 765M
72
GeForce MX350 +69%
122
VS

Graphics Card

May 2013
Release Date
Feb 2020
GeForce 700M
Generation
GeForce MX
Mobile
Type
Mobile
MXM-B (3.0)
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x4

Clock Speeds

797 MHz
Base Clock
747 MHz
863 MHz
Boost Clock
937 MHz
1002 MHz
Memory Clock
1752 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
64bit
64.13GB/s
Bandwidth
56.06GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
5
-
Compute Units
-
768
Shading Units
640
64
TMUs
32
16
ROPs
16
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
48 KB (per SM)
256 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB

Theoretical Performance

13.81 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
14.99 GPixel/s
55.23 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
29.98 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
18.74 GFLOPS
1326 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1199 GFLOPS
55.23 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
37.48 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

GK106
GPU Name
GP107
N14E-GE-B-A1
GPU Variant
GP107-670-A1 (N17S-G5-A1)
Kepler
Architecture
Pascal
TSMC
Foundry
Samsung
28 nm
Process Size
14 nm
2.54 billion
Transistors
3.3 billion
221 mm²
Die Size
132 mm²

Board Design

75W
TDP
20W
-
Suggested PSU
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
-
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.1
Vulkan
1.3
3.0
CUDA
6.1
5.1
Shader Model
6.4

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy