CPU
GPU
SoC
Categories
Rankings
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
English
English
Close menu
Home
CPU
GPU
SoC
Categories
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
Home
GPU Comparison
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 775M Mac Edition vs ATI Mobility Radeon HD 4650
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 775M Mac Edition vs ATI Mobility Radeon HD 4650
VS
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 775M Mac Edition
ATI Mobility Radeon HD 4650
We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM GeForce GTX 775M Mac Edition and 512MB VRAM Mobility Radeon HD 4650 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 775M Mac Edition 's Advantages
Released 4 years and 10 months late
Larger VRAM bandwidth (160.0GB/s vs 19.20GB/s)
1024 additional rendering cores
ATI Mobility Radeon HD 4650 's Advantages
Lower TDP (35W vs 100W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 775M Mac Edition
+569%
2.142 TFLOPS
Mobility Radeon HD 4650
0.32 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 775M Mac Edition
VS
Mobility Radeon HD 4650
Graphics Card
Nov 2013
Release Date
Jan 2009
GeForce 700M
Generation
M9x
Mobile
Type
Mobile
MXM-B (3.0)
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
-
-
Boost Clock
-
1250 MHz
Memory Clock
600 MHz
Memory
2GB
Memory Size
512MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
DDR2
256bit
Memory Bus
128bit
160.0GB/s
Bandwidth
19.20GB/s
Render Config
-
SM Count
-
-
Compute Units
4
1344
Shading Units
320
112
TMUs
32
32
ROPs
8
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
512 KB
L2 Cache
128 KB
Theoretical Performance
22.32 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
4.000 GPixel/s
89.26 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
16.00 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
2.142 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
320.0 GFLOPS
89.26 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Graphics Processor
GK104
GPU Name
M96
N13E-GTX-A2
GPU Variant
-
Kepler
Architecture
TeraScale
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
55 nm
3.54 billion
Transistors
0.514 billion
294 mm²
Die Size
146 mm²
Board Design
100W
TDP
35W
-
Suggested PSU
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
-
Power Connectors
-
Graphics Features
12 (11_0)
DirectX
10.1 (10_1)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.1
Vulkan
N/A
3.0
CUDA
-
5.1
Shader Model
4.1
Related GPU Comparisons
1
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 775M Mac Edition vs AMD Radeon R9 M295X Mac Edition
2
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 775M Mac Edition vs AMD Radeon RX 6450M
3
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 775M Mac Edition vs NVIDIA GeForce 800M
4
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 775M Mac Edition vs AMD Radeon Pro 570X
5
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 775M Mac Edition vs AMD Radeon R9 M275X
6
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 775M Mac Edition vs NVIDIA GeForce MX130
7
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 775M Mac Edition vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 240M LE
8
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 775M Mac Edition vs NVIDIA GeForce 410M
9
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 775M Mac Edition vs AMD Radeon R9 M295X
10
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 775M Mac Edition vs AMD Radeon HD 6770M Mac Edition
Related News
1
Concerns Raised by Unstable 13th/14th Gen Core CPUs: Motherboard Manufacturers Worry About Impact on Arrow Lake Release and Sales
2
Do You Really Know What a "Rendering Engine" Is? Read This Article to Understand All About It
3
New AMD Zen5 Ryzen 9000 Motherboards X870E/X870 to Adopt USB4! But You’ll Have to Wait Two More Months
4
Surpassing RTX 2050! Intel's Next-Gen Integrated Graphics Benchmark Closely Approaches AMD
5
New Benchmarks for AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 Revealed: Single-Core Parity with R9 7945HX3D, Multi-Core Still Lower
6
X3D Performance Beyond Words! AMD Ryzen 7 9700X May Unlock Power Consumption: From 65W to 120W
7
First Benchmark Leak of Intel Core Ultra 7 268V: Single-Core Performance Soars by 20%, Still Lags Behind AMD
8
NVIDIA Grace CPU Benchmark Results Released, Stunning Performance
9
Minisforum Launches UM890 Pro Mini PC with R9 8945HS and Dual USB4 Ports
10
Does the Apple A18 Neural Engine Boast Superior Performance? Computational Power May Surpass M4 Chip
© 2024 - TopCPU.net
Contact Us
Privacy Policy