CPU
GPU
SoC
Categories
Rankings
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
English
English
Close menu
Home
CPU
GPU
SoC
Categories
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
Home
GPU Comparison
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780 6 GB vs ATI FirePro V8700 Duo
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780 6 GB vs ATI FirePro V8700 Duo
VS
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780 6 GB
ATI FirePro V8700 Duo
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 6GB VRAM GeForce GTX 780 6 GB and 1024MB VRAM FirePro V8700 Duo to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780 6 GB 's Advantages
Boost Clock902MHz
More VRAM (6GB vs 1GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (288.4GB/s vs 108.8GB/s)
1504 additional rendering cores
ATI FirePro V8700 Duo 's Advantages
Lower TDP (151W vs 250W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 780 6 GB
+246%
4.156 TFLOPS
FirePro V8700 Duo
1.2 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 780 6 GB
VS
FirePro V8700 Duo
Graphics Card
Sep 2013
Release Date
Unknown
GeForce 700
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
863 MHz
Base Clock
-
902 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1502 MHz
Memory Clock
850 MHz
Memory
6GB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
384bit
Memory Bus
256bit
288.4GB/s
Bandwidth
108.8GB/s
Render Config
-
SM Count
-
-
Compute Units
10
2304
Shading Units
800
192
TMUs
40
48
ROPs
16
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
1536 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB
Theoretical Performance
43.30 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
12.00 GPixel/s
173.2 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
30.00 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
4.156 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1200 GFLOPS
173.2 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Graphics Processor
GK110B
GPU Name
RV770
GK110-301-B1
GPU Variant
RV770 XT (215-0669049)
Kepler
Architecture
TeraScale
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
55 nm
7.08 billion
Transistors
0.956 billion
561 mm²
Die Size
256 mm²
Board Design
250W
TDP
151W
600 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
2x DVI 1x HDMI 1.4a 1x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
No outputs
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
2x 6-pin
Graphics Features
12 (11_1)
DirectX
10.1 (10_1)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.1
Vulkan
N/A
3.5
CUDA
-
5.1
Shader Model
4.1
Related GPU Comparisons
1
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780 6 GB vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 745 OEM
2
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780 6 GB vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Ti AD104
3
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780 6 GB vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660 Rev. 2
4
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780 6 GB vs ATI Radeon X1050 AGP
5
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780 6 GB vs AMD FirePro S10000 Passive 12GB
6
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780 6 GB vs AMD Radeon RX 6500 XT
7
AMD Radeon R9 285 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780 6 GB
8
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780 6 GB vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 OEM
9
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780 6 GB vs AMD Radeon HD 7950
10
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780 6 GB vs AMD Radeon HD 6230
Related News
1
Ryzen AI 9 365 Benchmark Results Leaked: Significant Improvements in Multi-Core and IPC Performance Over Previous Generation
2
Concerns Raised by Unstable 13th/14th Gen Core CPUs: Motherboard Manufacturers Worry About Impact on Arrow Lake Release and Sales
3
Do You Really Know What a "Rendering Engine" Is? Read This Article to Understand All About It
4
New AMD Zen5 Ryzen 9000 Motherboards X870E/X870 to Adopt USB4! But You’ll Have to Wait Two More Months
5
Surpassing RTX 2050! Intel's Next-Gen Integrated Graphics Benchmark Closely Approaches AMD
6
New Benchmarks for AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 Revealed: Single-Core Parity with R9 7945HX3D, Multi-Core Still Lower
7
X3D Performance Beyond Words! AMD Ryzen 7 9700X May Unlock Power Consumption: From 65W to 120W
8
First Benchmark Leak of Intel Core Ultra 7 268V: Single-Core Performance Soars by 20%, Still Lags Behind AMD
9
NVIDIA Grace CPU Benchmark Results Released, Stunning Performance
10
Minisforum Launches UM890 Pro Mini PC with R9 8945HS and Dual USB4 Ports
© 2024 - TopCPU.net
Contact Us
Privacy Policy