CPU
GPU
SoC
Categories
Rankings
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
English
English
Close menu
Home
CPU
GPU
SoC
Categories
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
Home
GPU Comparison
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780 6 GB vs ATI Radeon HD 4870 X2
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780 6 GB vs ATI Radeon HD 4870 X2
VS
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780 6 GB
ATI Radeon HD 4870 X2
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 6GB VRAM GeForce GTX 780 6 GB and 1024MB VRAM Radeon HD 4870 X2 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780 6 GB 's Advantages
Released 5 years and 1 months late
Boost Clock902MHz
More VRAM (6GB vs 1GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (288.4GB/s vs 115.2GB/s)
1504 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (250W vs 286W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 780 6 GB
+246%
4.156 TFLOPS
Radeon HD 4870 X2
1.2 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 780 6 GB
VS
Radeon HD 4870 X2
Graphics Card
Sep 2013
Release Date
Aug 2008
GeForce 700
Generation
Radeon R700
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
863 MHz
Base Clock
-
902 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1502 MHz
Memory Clock
900 MHz
Memory
6GB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
384bit
Memory Bus
256bit
288.4GB/s
Bandwidth
115.2GB/s
Render Config
-
SM Count
-
-
Compute Units
10
2304
Shading Units
800
192
TMUs
40
48
ROPs
16
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
1536 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB
Theoretical Performance
43.30 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
12.00 GPixel/s
173.2 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
30.00 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
4.156 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1200 GFLOPS
173.2 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
240.0 GFLOPS
Graphics Processor
GK110B
GPU Name
R700
GK110-301-B1
GPU Variant
R700 XT (215-0669045)
Kepler
Architecture
TeraScale
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
55 nm
7.08 billion
Transistors
0.956 billion
561 mm²
Die Size
256 mm²
Board Design
250W
TDP
286W
600 W
Suggested PSU
600 W
2x DVI 1x HDMI 1.4a 1x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
2x DVI 1x S-Video
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Graphics Features
12 (11_1)
DirectX
10.1 (10_1)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.1
Vulkan
N/A
3.5
CUDA
-
5.1
Shader Model
4.1
Related GPU Comparisons
1
AMD Radeon R9 285 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780 6 GB
2
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780 6 GB
3
NVIDIA GeForce GT 1030 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780 6 GB
4
ATI Radeon HD 4870 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780 6 GB
5
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780 6 GB vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 545 OEM
6
AMD Radeon RX 460 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780 6 GB
7
NVIDIA GeForce 9300 GS Rev. 2 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780 6 GB
8
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780 6 GB vs AMD Radeon HD 8730 OEM
9
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780 6 GB vs AMD Radeon RX 7500 XT
10
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780 6 GB vs ATI Radeon HD 4670
Related News
1
Concerns Raised by Unstable 13th/14th Gen Core CPUs: Motherboard Manufacturers Worry About Impact on Arrow Lake Release and Sales
2
Do You Really Know What a "Rendering Engine" Is? Read This Article to Understand All About It
3
New AMD Zen5 Ryzen 9000 Motherboards X870E/X870 to Adopt USB4! But You’ll Have to Wait Two More Months
4
Surpassing RTX 2050! Intel's Next-Gen Integrated Graphics Benchmark Closely Approaches AMD
5
New Benchmarks for AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 Revealed: Single-Core Parity with R9 7945HX3D, Multi-Core Still Lower
6
X3D Performance Beyond Words! AMD Ryzen 7 9700X May Unlock Power Consumption: From 65W to 120W
7
First Benchmark Leak of Intel Core Ultra 7 268V: Single-Core Performance Soars by 20%, Still Lags Behind AMD
8
NVIDIA Grace CPU Benchmark Results Released, Stunning Performance
9
Minisforum Launches UM890 Pro Mini PC with R9 8945HS and Dual USB4 Ports
10
Does the Apple A18 Neural Engine Boast Superior Performance? Computational Power May Surpass M4 Chip
© 2024 - TopCPU.net
Contact Us
Privacy Policy