Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780 Ti 6 GB vs AMD FireStream 9250

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780 Ti 6 GB vs AMD FireStream 9250

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 6GB VRAM GeForce GTX 780 Ti 6 GB and 1024MB VRAM FireStream 9250 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780 Ti 6 GB 's Advantages
Boost Clock928MHz
More VRAM (6GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (336.6GB/s vs 63.55GB/s)
2080 additional rendering cores
AMD FireStream 9250 's Advantages
Lower TDP (150W vs 250W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 780 Ti 6 GB +434%
5.345 TFLOPS
FireStream 9250
1 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Unknown
Release Date
Jun 2008
GeForce 700
Generation
FireStream
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

875 MHz
Base Clock
-
928 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1753 MHz
Memory Clock
993 MHz

Memory

6GB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR3
384bit
Memory Bus
256bit
336.6GB/s
Bandwidth
63.55GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
10
-
-
-
2880
Shading Units
800
240
TMUs
40
48
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
1536 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

55.68 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
10.00 GPixel/s
222.7 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
25.00 GTexel/s
-
-
-
5.345 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1000 GFLOPS
222.7 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
200.0 GFLOPS

Board Design

250W
TDP
150W
600 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
2x DVI 1x HDMI 1.4a 1x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
1x DVI
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

GK110B
GPU Name
RV770
-
GPU Variant
RV770 PRO
Kepler
Architecture
TeraScale
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
55 nm
7.08 billion
Transistors
0.956 billion
561 mm²
Die Size
256 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_1)
DirectX
10.1 (10_1)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.1
Vulkan
N/A
3.5
CUDA
-
5.1
Shader Model
4.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy