Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780 Ti 6 GB vs AMD FireStream 9270

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780 Ti 6 GB vs AMD FireStream 9270

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 6GB VRAM GeForce GTX 780 Ti 6 GB and 2GB VRAM FireStream 9270 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780 Ti 6 GB 's Advantages
Boost Clock928MHz
More VRAM (6GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (336.6GB/s vs 115.2GB/s)
2080 additional rendering cores
AMD FireStream 9270 's Advantages
Lower TDP (160W vs 250W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 780 Ti 6 GB +345%
5.345 TFLOPS
FireStream 9270
1.2 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Unknown
Release Date
Nov 2008
GeForce 700
Generation
FireStream
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

875 MHz
Base Clock
-
928 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1753 MHz
Memory Clock
900 MHz

Memory

6GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
384bit
Memory Bus
256bit
336.6GB/s
Bandwidth
115.2GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
10
-
-
-
2880
Shading Units
800
240
TMUs
40
48
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
1536 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

55.68 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
12.00 GPixel/s
222.7 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
30.00 GTexel/s
-
-
-
5.345 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1200 GFLOPS
222.7 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
240.0 GFLOPS

Board Design

250W
TDP
160W
600 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
2x DVI 1x HDMI 1.4a 1x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
1x DVI
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
2x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

GK110B
GPU Name
RV770
-
GPU Variant
RV770 XT
Kepler
Architecture
TeraScale
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
55 nm
7.08 billion
Transistors
0.956 billion
561 mm²
Die Size
256 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_1)
DirectX
10.1 (10_1)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.1
Vulkan
N/A
3.5
CUDA
-
5.1
Shader Model
4.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy