NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780 Ti Engineering Sample vs Moore Threads MTT S1000M
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 3GB VRAM GeForce GTX 780 Ti Engineering Sample and 4GB VRAM Moore Threads MTT S1000M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780 Ti Engineering Sample 's Advantages
Boost Clock928MHz
Larger VRAM bandwidth (336.6GB/s vs 224.0GB/s)
1856 additional rendering cores
Moore Threads MTT S1000M 's Advantages
More VRAM (4GB vs 3GB)
Lower TDP (35W vs 250W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 780 Ti Engineering Sample
+160%
5.345 TFLOPS
Moore Threads MTT S1000M
2.048 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Unknown
Release Date
Jul 2022
GeForce 700
Generation
MUSA-Chunxiao
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x8
Clock Speeds
875 MHz
Base Clock
1000 MHz
928 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1753 MHz
Memory Clock
1750 MHz
Memory
3GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
384bit
Memory Bus
128bit
336.6GB/s
Bandwidth
224.0GB/s
Render Config
-
Compute Units
8
-
-
-
2880
Shading Units
1024
240
TMUs
64
48
ROPs
64
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
-
1536 KB
L2 Cache
1024 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
55.68 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
64.00 GPixel/s
222.7 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
64.00 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
4.096 TFLOPS
5.345 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.048 TFLOPS
222.7 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
32.00 GFLOPS
Board Design
250W
TDP
35W
600 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
2x DVI
1x HDMI 1.4a
1x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
2x DisplayPort 1.2
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
GK180
GPU Name
MTT Gen 1
GK180-425-A1
GPU Variant
-
Kepler
Architecture
MUSA-Chunxiao
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
12 nm
7.08 billion
Transistors
Unknown
561 mm²
Die Size
Unknown
Graphics Features
12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.2.175
Vulkan
1.4
3.5
CUDA
-
5.1
Shader Model
6.5
