NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780 Ti Engineering Sample vs Moore Threads MTT S3000
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 3GB VRAM GeForce GTX 780 Ti Engineering Sample and 32GB VRAM Moore Threads MTT S3000 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780 Ti Engineering Sample 's Advantages
Boost Clock928MHz
Moore Threads MTT S3000 's Advantages
More VRAM (32GB vs 3GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (448.0GB/s vs 336.6GB/s)
1216 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 780 Ti Engineering Sample
5.345 TFLOPS
Moore Threads MTT S3000
+191%
15.56 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Unknown
Release Date
Unknown
GeForce 700
Generation
MUSA-Chunxiao
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 5.0 x16
Clock Speeds
875 MHz
Base Clock
1900 MHz
928 MHz
Boost Clock
0 MHz
1753 MHz
Memory Clock
1750 MHz
Memory
3GB
Memory Size
32GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
384bit
Memory Bus
256bit
336.6GB/s
Bandwidth
448.0GB/s
Render Config
-
Compute Units
32
-
-
-
2880
Shading Units
4096
240
TMUs
256
48
ROPs
256
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
-
1536 KB
L2 Cache
4 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
55.68 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
486.4 GPixel/s
222.7 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
486.4 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
31.13 TFLOPS
5.345 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
15.56 TFLOPS
222.7 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
243.2 GFLOPS
Board Design
250W
TDP
250W
600 W
Suggested PSU
600 W
2x DVI
1x HDMI 1.4a
1x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
2x DisplayPort 1.4a
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
1x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
GK180
GPU Name
MTT Gen 2
GK180-425-A1
GPU Variant
-
Kepler
Architecture
MUSA-Chunxiao
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
12 nm
7.08 billion
Transistors
22 billion
561 mm²
Die Size
Unknown
Graphics Features
12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.2.175
Vulkan
1.4
3.5
CUDA
-
5.1
Shader Model
6.5
