NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780 Ti Engineering Sample vs NVIDIA RTX 5000 Ada Generation
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 3GB VRAM GeForce GTX 780 Ti Engineering Sample and 32GB VRAM RTX 5000 Ada Generation to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA RTX 5000 Ada Generation 's Advantages
Boost Clock has increased by 175% (2550MHz vs 928MHz)
More VRAM (32GB vs 3GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (576.0GB/s vs 336.6GB/s)
9920 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 780 Ti Engineering Sample
5.345 TFLOPS
RTX 5000 Ada Generation
+1121%
65.28 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Unknown
Release Date
Aug 2023
GeForce 700
Generation
Quadro Ada
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16
Clock Speeds
875 MHz
Base Clock
1155 MHz
928 MHz
Boost Clock
2550 MHz
1753 MHz
Memory Clock
2250 MHz
Memory
3GB
Memory Size
32GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
384bit
Memory Bus
256bit
336.6GB/s
Bandwidth
576.0GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
-
SM Count
100
2880
Shading Units
12800
240
TMUs
400
48
ROPs
176
-
Tensor Cores
400
-
RT Cores
100
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
1536 KB
L2 Cache
72 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
55.68 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
448.8 GPixel/s
222.7 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
1020 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
65.28 TFLOPS
5.345 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
65.28 TFLOPS
222.7 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
1020 GFLOPS
Board Design
250W
TDP
250W
600 W
Suggested PSU
600 W
2x DVI
1x HDMI 1.4a
1x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
4x DisplayPort 1.4a
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
1x 16-pin
Graphics Processor
GK180
GPU Name
AD102
GK180-425-A1
GPU Variant
AD102
Kepler
Architecture
Ada Lovelace
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
5 nm
7.08 billion
Transistors
76.3 billion
561 mm²
Die Size
609 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.2.175
Vulkan
1.3
3.5
CUDA
8.9
5.1
Shader Model
6.7
