Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780 vs AMD FirePro W8000

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780 vs AMD FirePro W8000

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 3GB VRAM GeForce GTX 780 and 4GB VRAM FirePro W8000 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780 's Advantages
Released 11 months late
Boost Clock902MHz
Larger VRAM bandwidth (288.4GB/s vs 176.0GB/s)
512 additional rendering cores
AMD FirePro W8000 's Advantages
More VRAM (4GB vs 3GB)
Lower TDP (225W vs 250W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 780 +28%
4.156 TFLOPS
FirePro W8000
3.226 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

May 2013
Release Date
Jun 2012
GeForce 700
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

863 MHz
Base Clock
-
902 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1502 MHz
Memory Clock
1375 MHz

Memory

3GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
384bit
Memory Bus
256bit
288.4GB/s
Bandwidth
176.0GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
28
-
-
-
2304
Shading Units
1792
192
TMUs
112
48
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
1536 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

43.30 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
28.80 GPixel/s
173.2 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
100.8 GTexel/s
-
-
-
4.156 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
3.226 TFLOPS
173.2 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
806.4 GFLOPS

Board Design

250W
TDP
225W
600 W
Suggested PSU
550 W
2x DVI 1x HDMI 1.4a 1x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
4x DisplayPort 1.2 1x SDI
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
2x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

GK110
GPU Name
Tahiti
GK110-300-A1
GPU Variant
Tahiti PRO GL
Kepler
Architecture
GCN 1.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
28 nm
7.08 billion
Transistors
4.313 billion
561 mm²
Die Size
352 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
1.2
1.1
Vulkan
1.2
3.5
CUDA
-
5.1
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy