Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780M Mac Edition vs AMD FirePro M8900

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780M Mac Edition vs AMD FirePro M8900

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM GeForce GTX 780M Mac Edition and 2GB VRAM FirePro M8900 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780M Mac Edition 's Advantages
Released 2 years and 7 months late
Boost Clock797MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (160.0GB/s vs 115.2GB/s)
576 additional rendering cores
AMD FirePro M8900 's Advantages
Lower TDP (75W vs 122W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 780M Mac Edition +87%
2.448 TFLOPS
FirePro M8900
1.306 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Nov 2013
Release Date
Apr 2011
GeForce 700M
Generation
FirePro Mobile
Mobile
Type
Mobile
MXM-B (3.0)
Bus Interface
MXM-B (3.0)

Clock Speeds

771 MHz
Base Clock
-
797 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1250 MHz
Memory Clock
900 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
256bit
160.0GB/s
Bandwidth
115.2GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
12
-
-
-
1536
Shading Units
960
128
TMUs
48
32
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
8 KB (per CU)
512 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

25.50 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
21.76 GPixel/s
102.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
32.64 GTexel/s
-
-
-
2.448 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1306 GFLOPS
102.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

122W
TDP
75W
-
-
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
-
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

GK104
GPU Name
Blackcomb
N14E-GTX-A2
GPU Variant
Blackcomb XT GL
Kepler
Architecture
TeraScale 2
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
40 nm
3.54 billion
Transistors
1.7 billion
294 mm²
Die Size
212 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
11.2 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.4
3.0
OpenCL
1.2
1.1
Vulkan
N/A
3.0
CUDA
-
5.1
Shader Model
5.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy