Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780M Mac Edition vs AMD Radeon R9 M395 Mac Edition

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780M Mac Edition vs AMD Radeon R9 M395 Mac Edition

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM GeForce GTX 780M Mac Edition and 2GB VRAM Radeon R9 M395 Mac Edition to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780M Mac Edition 's Advantages
Boost Clock797MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 2GB)
Lower TDP (122W vs 250W)
AMD Radeon R9 M395 Mac Edition 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 6 months late
Larger VRAM bandwidth (174.7GB/s vs 160.0GB/s)
256 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 780M Mac Edition
2.448 TFLOPS
Radeon R9 M395 Mac Edition +22%
2.989 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Nov 2013
Release Date
May 2015
GeForce 700M
Generation
Crystal System
Mobile
Type
Mobile
MXM-B (3.0)
Bus Interface
MXM-B (3.0)

Clock Speeds

771 MHz
Base Clock
-
797 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1250 MHz
Memory Clock
1365 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
256bit
160.0GB/s
Bandwidth
174.7GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
28
-
-
-
1536
Shading Units
1792
128
TMUs
112
32
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
-
512 KB
L2 Cache
-
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

25.50 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
26.69 GPixel/s
102.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
93.41 GTexel/s
-
-
-
2.448 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.989 TFLOPS
102.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
373.6 GFLOPS

Board Design

122W
TDP
250W
-
-
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
-
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

GK104
GPU Name
Amethyst
N14E-GTX-A2
GPU Variant
Amethyst PRO (216-0872004)
Kepler
Architecture
GCN 3.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
28 nm
3.54 billion
Transistors
5 billion
294 mm²
Die Size
366 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
2.0
1.1
Vulkan
1.2
3.0
CUDA
-
5.1
Shader Model
6.3

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy