NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950 Low Power vs Intel Arc A780
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM GeForce GTX 950 Low Power and 16GB VRAM Arc A780 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950 Low Power 's Advantages
Lower TDP (75W vs 200W)
Intel Arc A780 's Advantages
Boost Clock has increased by 85% (2200MHz vs 1190MHz)
More VRAM (16GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (559.6GB/s vs 105.8GB/s)
3328 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 950 Low Power
1.828 TFLOPS
Arc A780
+885%
18.02 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Mar 2016
Release Date
Unknown
GeForce 900
Generation
Alchemist(Arc 7)
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1026 MHz
Base Clock
2200 MHz
1190 MHz
Boost Clock
2200 MHz
1653 MHz
Memory Clock
1093 MHz
Memory
2GB
Memory Size
16GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6X
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
105.8GB/s
Bandwidth
559.6GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
-
-
-
768
Shading Units
4096
48
TMUs
256
32
ROPs
128
-
Tensor Cores
512
-
RT Cores
32
48 KB (per SMM)
L1 Cache
-
1024 KB
L2 Cache
16 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
38.08 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
281.6 GPixel/s
57.12 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
563.2 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
36.04 TFLOPS
1.828 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
18.02 TFLOPS
57.12 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
2.253 TFLOPS
Board Design
75W
TDP
200W
250 W
Suggested PSU
550 W
1x DVI
1x HDMI 2.0
3x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
1x HDMI 2.13x DisplayPort 2.0
None
Power Connectors
2x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
GM206
GPU Name
DG2-512
GM206-251-A1
GPU Variant
ACM-G10
Maxwell 2.0
Architecture
Generation 12.7
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
6 nm
2.94 billion
Transistors
21.7 billion
228 mm²
Die Size
406 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
5.2
CUDA
-
6.4
Shader Model
6.6
