Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950 Low Power vs ATI FireMV 2400 PCI

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950 Low Power vs ATI FireMV 2400 PCI

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM GeForce GTX 950 Low Power and 128MB VRAM FireMV 2400 PCI to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950 Low Power 's Advantages
Released 8 years and 2 months late
Boost Clock1190MHz
Larger VRAM bandwidth (105.8GB/s vs 16.00GB/s)
768 additional rendering cores
ATI FireMV 2400 PCI 's Advantages
Lower TDP (20W vs 75W)

Score

VS

Graphics Card

Mar 2016
Release Date
Jan 2008
GeForce 900
Generation
FireMV Multi-View
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCI

Clock Speeds

1026 MHz
Base Clock
-
1190 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1653 MHz
Memory Clock
500 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
128MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
DDR
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
105.8GB/s
Bandwidth
16.00GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
-
-
Compute Units
-
768
Shading Units
-
48
TMUs
4
32
ROPs
4
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
48 KB (per SMM)
L1 Cache
-
1024 KB
L2 Cache
-

Theoretical Performance

38.08 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.000 GPixel/s
57.12 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
2.000 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
1.828 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
-
57.12 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Graphics Processor

GM206
GPU Name
RV380
GM206-251-A1
GPU Variant
-
Maxwell 2.0
Architecture
Rage 9
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
130 nm
2.94 billion
Transistors
0.075 billion
228 mm²
Die Size
92 mm²

Board Design

75W
TDP
20W
250 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
1x DVI 1x HDMI 2.0 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
1x VHDCI
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
9.0
4.6
OpenGL
2.0
3.0
OpenCL
N/A
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
5.2
CUDA
-
6.4
Shader Model
-

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy