NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950 Low Power vs ATI FireMV 2400 PCIe x1
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM GeForce GTX 950 Low Power and 64MB VRAM FireMV 2400 PCIe x1 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950 Low Power 's Advantages
Released 8 years and 2 months late
Boost Clock1190MHz
More VRAM (2GB vs 64GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (105.8GB/s vs 6.496GB/s)
768 additional rendering cores
ATI FireMV 2400 PCIe x1 's Advantages
Lower TDP (20W vs 75W)
Score
Graphics Card
Mar 2016
Release Date
Jan 2008
GeForce 900
Generation
FireMV Multi-View
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x1
Clock Speeds
1026 MHz
Base Clock
-
1190 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1653 MHz
Memory Clock
203 MHz
Memory
2GB
Memory Size
64MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
DDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
105.8GB/s
Bandwidth
6.496GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
-
-
-
768
Shading Units
-
48
TMUs
4
32
ROPs
4
-
-
-
-
-
-
48 KB (per SMM)
L1 Cache
-
1024 KB
L2 Cache
-
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
38.08 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
1.000 GPixel/s
57.12 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
1.000 GTexel/s
-
-
-
1.828 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
-
57.12 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Board Design
75W
TDP
20W
250 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
1x DVI
1x HDMI 2.0
3x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
1x VHDCI
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
GM206
GPU Name
RV380
GM206-251-A1
GPU Variant
-
Maxwell 2.0
Architecture
Rage 9
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
130 nm
2.94 billion
Transistors
0.075 billion
228 mm²
Die Size
92 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
9.0
4.6
OpenGL
2.0
3.0
OpenCL
N/A
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
5.2
CUDA
-
6.4
Shader Model
-
