NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950 Low Power vs ATI FirePro V5700
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM GeForce GTX 950 Low Power and 512MB VRAM FirePro V5700 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950 Low Power 's Advantages
Released 7 years and 7 months late
Boost Clock1190MHz
More VRAM (2GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (105.8GB/s vs 28.80GB/s)
448 additional rendering cores
ATI FirePro V5700 's Advantages
Lower TDP (56W vs 75W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 950 Low Power
+308%
1.828 TFLOPS
FirePro V5700
0.448 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Mar 2016
Release Date
Aug 2008
GeForce 900
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1026 MHz
Base Clock
-
1190 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1653 MHz
Memory Clock
900 MHz
Memory
2GB
Memory Size
512MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
105.8GB/s
Bandwidth
28.80GB/s
Render Config
-
Compute Units
4
-
-
-
768
Shading Units
320
48
TMUs
32
32
ROPs
8
-
-
-
-
-
-
48 KB (per SMM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
1024 KB
L2 Cache
128 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
38.08 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
5.600 GPixel/s
57.12 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
22.40 GTexel/s
-
-
-
1.828 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
448.0 GFLOPS
57.12 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Board Design
75W
TDP
56W
250 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
1x DVI
1x HDMI 2.0
3x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
1x DVI
2x DisplayPort 1.0
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
GM206
GPU Name
RV730
GM206-251-A1
GPU Variant
RV730 XT
(215-0719047)
Maxwell 2.0
Architecture
TeraScale
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
55 nm
2.94 billion
Transistors
0.514 billion
228 mm²
Die Size
146 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
10.1 (10_1)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
5.2
CUDA
-
6.4
Shader Model
4.1
