Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950 Low Power vs NVIDIA GeForce 8600 GTS

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950 Low Power vs NVIDIA GeForce 8600 GTS

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM GeForce GTX 950 Low Power and 256MB VRAM GeForce 8600 GTS to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950 Low Power 's Advantages
Released 8 years and 11 months late
Boost Clock1190MHz
More VRAM (2GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (105.8GB/s vs 32.00GB/s)
736 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA GeForce 8600 GTS 's Advantages
Lower TDP (60W vs 75W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 950 Low Power +1865%
1.828 TFLOPS
GeForce 8600 GTS
0.093 TFLOPS

Graphics Card

Mar 2016
Release Date
Apr 2007
GeForce 900
Generation
GeForce 8
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 1.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1026 MHz
Base Clock
-
1190 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1653 MHz
Memory Clock
1000 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
256MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
105.8GB/s
Bandwidth
32.00GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
-
SM Count
4
768
Shading Units
32
48
TMUs
16
32
ROPs
8
-
-
-
-
-
-
48 KB (per SMM)
L1 Cache
-
1024 KB
L2 Cache
32 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

38.08 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
5.400 GPixel/s
57.12 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
10.80 GTexel/s
-
-
-
1.828 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
92.80 GFLOPS
57.12 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

75W
TDP
60W
250 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
1x DVI 1x HDMI 2.0 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
2x DVI 1x S-Video
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

GM206
GPU Name
G84
GM206-251-A1
GPU Variant
G84-400-A2
Maxwell 2.0
Architecture
Tesla
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
80 nm
2.94 billion
Transistors
0.289 billion
228 mm²
Die Size
169 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
5.2
CUDA
1.1
6.4
Shader Model
4.0
© 2025 - TopCPU.net