NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950 Low Power vs NVIDIA GeForce 8800 GTS Core 112
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM GeForce GTX 950 Low Power and 640MB VRAM GeForce 8800 GTS Core 112 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950 Low Power 's Advantages
Released 8 years and 4 months late
Boost Clock1190MHz
More VRAM (2GB vs 640GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (105.8GB/s vs 64.00GB/s)
656 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (75W vs 150W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 950 Low Power
+579%
1.828 TFLOPS
GeForce 8800 GTS Core 112
0.269 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Mar 2016
Release Date
Nov 2007
GeForce 900
Generation
GeForce 8
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 1.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1026 MHz
Base Clock
-
1190 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1653 MHz
Memory Clock
800 MHz
Memory
2GB
Memory Size
640MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
320bit
105.8GB/s
Bandwidth
64.00GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
-
SM Count
14
768
Shading Units
112
48
TMUs
28
32
ROPs
20
-
-
-
-
-
-
48 KB (per SMM)
L1 Cache
-
1024 KB
L2 Cache
80 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
38.08 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
10.00 GPixel/s
57.12 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
28.00 GTexel/s
-
-
-
1.828 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
268.8 GFLOPS
57.12 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Board Design
75W
TDP
150W
250 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
1x DVI
1x HDMI 2.0
3x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
2x DVI
1x S-Video
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin
Graphics Processor
GM206
GPU Name
G80
GM206-251-A1
GPU Variant
G80-100-K0-A2
Maxwell 2.0
Architecture
Tesla
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
90 nm
2.94 billion
Transistors
0.681 billion
228 mm²
Die Size
484 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1 (1.0)
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
5.2
CUDA
1.0
6.4
Shader Model
4.0
