NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950 Low Power vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 460 SE v2
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM GeForce GTX 950 Low Power and 768MB VRAM GeForce GTX 460 SE v2 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950 Low Power 's Advantages
Released 5 years and 4 months late
Boost Clock1190MHz
More VRAM (2GB vs 768GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (105.8GB/s vs 81.60GB/s)
480 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (75W vs 150W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 950 Low Power
+144%
1.828 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 460 SE v2
0.749 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Mar 2016
Release Date
Nov 2010
GeForce 900
Generation
GeForce 400
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1026 MHz
Base Clock
-
1190 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1653 MHz
Memory Clock
850 MHz
Memory
2GB
Memory Size
768MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
192bit
105.8GB/s
Bandwidth
81.60GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
-
SM Count
6
768
Shading Units
288
48
TMUs
48
32
ROPs
24
-
-
-
-
-
-
48 KB (per SMM)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
1024 KB
L2 Cache
384 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
38.08 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
7.800 GPixel/s
57.12 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
31.20 GTexel/s
-
-
-
1.828 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
748.8 GFLOPS
57.12 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
62.40 GFLOPS
Board Design
75W
TDP
150W
250 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
1x DVI
1x HDMI 2.0
3x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
2x DVI
1x mini-HDMI 1.3a
None
Power Connectors
2x 6-pin
Graphics Processor
GM206
GPU Name
GF114
GM206-251-A1
GPU Variant
GF114-400-A1
Maxwell 2.0
Architecture
Fermi 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
40 nm
2.94 billion
Transistors
1.95 billion
228 mm²
Die Size
332 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
5.2
CUDA
2.1
6.4
Shader Model
5.1
