NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950 Low Power vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 GM206
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM GeForce GTX 950 Low Power and 2GB VRAM GeForce GTX 750 GM206 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950 Low Power 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (105.8GB/s vs 80.19GB/s)
256 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 GM206 's Advantages
Boost Clock has increased by 4% (1239MHz vs 1190MHz)
Lower TDP (60W vs 75W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 950 Low Power
+44%
1.828 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 750 GM206
1.269 TFLOPS
OctaneBench
GeForce GTX 950 Low Power
+51%
44
GeForce GTX 750 GM206
29
Graphics Card
Mar 2016
Release Date
Nov 2015
GeForce 900
Generation
GeForce 700
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1026 MHz
Base Clock
1087 MHz
1190 MHz
Boost Clock
1239 MHz
1653 MHz
Memory Clock
1253 MHz
Memory
2GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
105.8GB/s
Bandwidth
80.19GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
-
-
-
768
Shading Units
512
48
TMUs
32
32
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
48 KB (per SMM)
L1 Cache
48 KB (per SMM)
1024 KB
L2 Cache
1024 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
38.08 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
39.65 GPixel/s
57.12 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
39.65 GTexel/s
-
-
-
1.828 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1269 GFLOPS
57.12 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
39.65 GFLOPS
Board Design
75W
TDP
60W
250 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
1x DVI
1x HDMI 2.0
3x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
2x DVI
1x HDMI 2.0
None
Power Connectors
-
Graphics Processor
GM206
GPU Name
GM206
GM206-251-A1
GPU Variant
-
Maxwell 2.0
Architecture
Maxwell 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
28 nm
2.94 billion
Transistors
2.94 billion
228 mm²
Die Size
228 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
5.2
CUDA
5.2
6.4
Shader Model
6.4
