Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950 Low Power vs Moore Threads MTT S1000M

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950 Low Power vs Moore Threads MTT S1000M

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM GeForce GTX 950 Low Power and 4GB VRAM Moore Threads MTT S1000M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950 Low Power 's Advantages
Boost Clock1190MHz
Moore Threads MTT S1000M 's Advantages
Released 6 years and 4 months late
More VRAM (4GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (224.0GB/s vs 105.8GB/s)
256 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (35W vs 75W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 950 Low Power
1.828 TFLOPS
Moore Threads MTT S1000M +12%
2.048 TFLOPS

Graphics Card

Mar 2016
Release Date
Jul 2022
GeForce 900
Generation
MUSA-Chunxiao
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x8

Clock Speeds

1026 MHz
Base Clock
1000 MHz
1190 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1653 MHz
Memory Clock
1750 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
105.8GB/s
Bandwidth
224.0GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
8
-
-
-
768
Shading Units
1024
48
TMUs
64
32
ROPs
64
-
-
-
-
-
-
48 KB (per SMM)
L1 Cache
-
1024 KB
L2 Cache
1024 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

38.08 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
64.00 GPixel/s
57.12 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
64.00 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
4.096 TFLOPS
1.828 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.048 TFLOPS
57.12 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
32.00 GFLOPS

Board Design

75W
TDP
35W
250 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
1x DVI 1x HDMI 2.0 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
2x DisplayPort 1.2
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

GM206
GPU Name
MTT Gen 1
GM206-251-A1
GPU Variant
-
Maxwell 2.0
Architecture
MUSA-Chunxiao
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
12 nm
2.94 billion
Transistors
Unknown
228 mm²
Die Size
Unknown

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.4
5.2
CUDA
-
6.4
Shader Model
6.5
© 2025 - TopCPU.net