Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950 Low Power vs NVIDIA NVS 300

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950 Low Power vs NVIDIA NVS 300

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM GeForce GTX 950 Low Power and 512MB VRAM NVS 300 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950 Low Power 's Advantages
Released 5 years and 2 months late
Boost Clock1190MHz
More VRAM (2GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (105.8GB/s vs 12.64GB/s)
752 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA NVS 300 's Advantages
Lower TDP (18W vs 75W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 950 Low Power +4587%
1.828 TFLOPS
NVS 300
0.039 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Mar 2016
Release Date
Jan 2011
GeForce 900
Generation
NVS
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1026 MHz
Base Clock
-
1190 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1653 MHz
Memory Clock
790 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
512MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
DDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
64bit
105.8GB/s
Bandwidth
12.64GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
-
SM Count
2
768
Shading Units
16
48
TMUs
8
32
ROPs
4
-
-
-
-
-
-
48 KB (per SMM)
L1 Cache
-
1024 KB
L2 Cache
32 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

38.08 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.080 GPixel/s
57.12 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
4.160 GTexel/s
-
-
-
1.828 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
39.36 GFLOPS
57.12 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

75W
TDP
18W
250 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
1x DVI 1x HDMI 2.0 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
1x DMS-59
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

GM206
GPU Name
GT218
GM206-251-A1
GPU Variant
GT218-670-B1
Maxwell 2.0
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
40 nm
2.94 billion
Transistors
0.26 billion
228 mm²
Die Size
57 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
11.1 (10_1)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
5.2
CUDA
1.2
6.4
Shader Model
4.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy